Arthoscopic Supraspinatous Repair

 

Large Supraspinatous TearSS tear arthroscopy GHJSS tear arthroscopy

 

Advantages

 

Improved cosmesis

Shorter hospital stay / less immediate post operative pain

Deltoid not detached

Ability to evaluate and treat coexisting intra-articular pathology i.e. biceps

 

Disadvantage

 

No quicker to rehab or return to activities 

- limiting factor is healing of tendon to bone

- healing rates not as high especially for large to massive tears

- steep learning curve / longer surgery

 

Issues

 

1.  Footprint

- 25 x 15 mm

- healing zone

- the greater the extent a repair covers, the greater the chance for tendon bone healing

 

2.  Suture technique

 

Note:  Most common means of failure is suture cutout

 

A.  Open transosseous

 

Technique

- performed in open surgery

- captures a wide section of cuff footpring

- very secure repair with uniform compression between cuff and bone

 

B.  Single row repair

 

Technique

- anchors placed in line laterally at insertion

 

C.  Double row repair

 

Technique

- medial anchor row at articular margin

- lateral anchor row at lateral footprint

 

Kim et al Am J Sports Med 2006

- biomechanical study

- more successful at restoring footprint

- less gap formation

- increased load to failure

 

D.  Transosseous equivalent / suture bridge

 

Technique

- biomechanically replicate tradional open transosseous

- sutures crossed as below in double row

- aiming to increase contact between cuff and footprint

 

Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Cuff Repair

 

Siskoksy et al AAOS 2007

- biomechanical study suture bridge v double row

- bridge higher load to failure

- no difference in gap formation

 

Results 

 

Outcome arthroscopic

 

Lafosse et al AA Should Elbow Surgeons 2006

- 105 patients treated with double row

- 11.45 structural failure on CT / MRI

 

Sugaya et al JBJS Am 2007

- prospective study 106 FT

- arthroscopic double row

- MRI follow up

- 17% retear

- 5 % small to medium

- 40% large and massive

 

Arthrocopy v mini-open

 

Kim et al Arthroscopy 2003

- arthroscopy v mini open

- similar outcomes in each group

- poor outcome related to size of tear, not method of repair

 

Verma et al Arthroscopy 2006

- arthroscopy v mini open

- US review

- 24% retear mini-open

- 25% retear arthroscopic

- no difference in outcome

 

Bishop et al AAOS 2004

- mini open v arthroscopic

- MRI review

- tears < 3 cm: 26% retear mini open, 16% arthroscopic

- tears > 3m: 38% v 76%

- do larger tears do better with open surgery?

 

Morse et al Am J Sports Med 2008

- meta-analysis of arthroscopic v open

- no difference in outcome or complications

 

Single v Double Row

 

Francheschi et al Am J Sports Med 2007

- RCT single v double row

- 60 patient

- no difference functional outcome

- improved cuff appearance on MRI

 

Burks et al Am J Sports Med 2009

- RCT single row v double row

- 20 in each group

- 1 retear in each group

- no difference in MRI appearance or clinical outcome

 

Cost

 

Churchill et al J Should Elbow Surg

- arthroscopic took average 10 minutes longer / cost $1000 dollars more

- even at high volume centres

 

Arthroscopic Supraspinatous Repair

 

Technique

 

Position

- lateral decubitus with arm traction 10 lb or

- beachchair in Tmax / Spyder (can depress arm and ER to aid visualisation)

- water pump

- useful to have adrenalin in bags

- stable BP 110 (interscalene block can help)

- inject LA with A into subacromial space and prospective portals

 

Portals

 

Posterior Portal

- make more superior and lateral

- awkward for GHJ arthroscopy

- good visualisation in subacromial space

- will put camera over and high above tear

 

Lateral portal

- standard position

- insert large 8 mm cannula (will need to pass sutures)

- perform bursectomy +++ for visulisation

- bursa posteriorly and medially often bleeds

- perform SAD

- control bleeding with electrocautery and temporary increases in pump pressure

 

Anterior portal

- smaller 6 mm

- for suture shuttling

 

Preparation

 

Prepare insertion

- debride tendon edges

- debride footprint to punctate bleeding

 

Arthroscopic Cuff TearArthroscopic Cuff Prepare InsertionArthroscopic Cuff Prepared Footprint

 

Assess tendon mobilisation / tear geometry

- perform releases if needed

- as per open surgery

- above and below tendon 1 cm medial to glenoid

- release coracohumeral ligament

 

Repair

 

Large U shaped tendon

- insert margin convergence sutures

- put camera in lateral portal

- insert posterior cannula over switching stick

- anterior and posterior bird beaks

 

Arthroscopic Cuff Repair Margin Convergance 1Arthroscopic Cuff Repair Margin Convergance 2

 

Place medial row anchors

- anterior first

- insert 18 G spinal needle and ensure good angle

- just medial to articular cartilage

- stab incision

- insert 5 mm anchor

 

RCR arthroscopic Spinal NeedleRCR Arthroscopic TapRCR Arthroscopic AnchorRCR Arthroscopic Anchor 2

 

Pass sutures in lateral margin cuff

- camera posterior

- elite / scorpion / concept suture passer via lateral portal

- pass sutures through cuff anterior to posterior

- retrieve sutures through anterior portal

- retrieve via anterior portal

 

Suture PassageSuture Retrieval

 

Repeat with posterior anchors

 

Large Cuff Repair 1Large Cuff Repair 2Large Cuff Repair 3

 

Tie sutures

- posterior to anterior / anterior to posterior

 

Double row

- either pass second lateral row of anchors or

- use foot print anchors, retrieve previous sutures

- can make suture bridge configuration

- check repair via lateral portal

 

Arthroscopic Supraspinatous RepairArthroscopic Cuff Suture Bridge RepairArthrscopic Cuff Repair