Specific Management

 

Most common locations

 

1. Femur

- femoral neck

- subtrochanteric / femoral shaft

- acetabular

- femoral shaft

- supracondylar

 

2. Humerus

- proximal humerus

- humeral shaft

 

3. Tibia

 

Femoral Neck pathological fracture / Major bone loss

 

Intertrochanteric MetastasisIntertrochanteric Met Prosthesis

 

Issues

- fracture unlikely to heal

- hemi versus THA

- long versus short stems

 

Hemi v THA

 

Consider life expectancy of patient

 

Varady et al J Arthroplasty 2019

- hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for pathological femoral neck fractures

- THA longer operative times

- no difference 30 day complication rate

 

Femoral stem length

 

Xing et al CORR 2013

- 203 patients with proximal femoral metastasis treated with arthroplasty

- no increased revision rate with short stems

- increased complications with long stems, especially cardiopulmonary complications

 

Fem met 1Fem met 2Fem met 3

 

Femoral neck stabilization

 

Issues

- sufficient bone for fixation?

- determine if lesions further down femur (xray entire femur)

- consider augmentation with PMMA / cement

 

Hip metFemoral met

 

Plate versus IM nail

 

Meynard et al Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020

- 309 cases proximal femoral metastasis

- plate versus IMN versus arthroplasty

- no difference in functional outcome

- increased complications with plating

 

Subtrochanteric / Femoral shaft metastasis

 

Subtrochanteric Metastasis and Nail0001Subtrochanteric Metastasis and Nail0002

 

Metastasis Femoral Shaft0002Metastasis Femoral Shaft0001

 

Management

 

Reconstruction nail

- consider cement

- consider venting

 

Durability

 

Chafey et al CORR 2018

- 217 patients treated with cephalomedullary nails for proximal femoral metastasis

- revision surgery required in 10%

- more common with survival > 7 months

 

Cement

 

Kim et al Bone Joint J 2016

- 43 patients with IMN + cement of femur and humerus versus 27 IMN

- lower pain scores with cement

- some reduction of metastasis progression with cement

 

Venting / Negative pressure reaming / Reamer Irrigator Aspirator

 

Risk of cardiopulmonary complications from fat / air / cancer emboli

 

Cole et al Injury 2000

- 73 femoral nails for metastatic impending fracture

- 2 deaths from fat embolism

 

Bilateral nails

 

Nian et al Cancers 2023

- systematic review of staged versus simultaneous IMN for femoral metastasis

- 156 IMN in 78 patients

- lower total complications with staged

- no difference in mortality

 

Acetabular Metastasis

 

Harrington classification

 

Type Defect
Type I

Minor cavitary defect

Medial and superior walls intact

Type II

Major deficit in medial wall

Rim intact

Type III Massive deficit in lateral wall & superior cortex

 

Options

 

Tantalum augmented cups

Cemented Harrington technique / steinmann pins

Cup-cage

 

Metastasis Acetabulum Type III APMetastasis Acetabulum Type III LateralAcetabular Metastasis Steinman Pins

Harrington technique

 

Acetab met 1Acetab met saddle 1Acetab met saddle 2

Cup-cage technique

 

Acetabular Metastasis Type IIAcetabular Metastasis Antiprotrusio Cage

 

Results

 

Houdek et al JBJS Am 2020

- 78 patients with Harrington technique versus 37 tantalum acetabular reconstruction

- overall, 21% required additional surgical procedures

- tantalum cups more durable with fewer complications

 

Rowell et al CORR 2019

- cup cage in 47 hips with acetabular metastases

- one patient had loosening due to recurrence 8 years post surgery

 

Supracondylar Femur 

 

Options

 

Plate / dual plate

Retrograde nail  

Modular knee prosthesis

 

Metastasis Distal Femur CTRenal Met EmbolisationMetastasis Distal Femur Plate and PMMA

 

Dis femur met 1Dis femur met 2Dis femur met 4Dis femur met 5

 

Supra met 1Supra met 2Supra met 3

 

Proximal Humerus 

 

Options

 

ORIF with plate +/- cement

IMN +/- cement

Tumour prosthesis

 

 

Prox humerus met 1Prox humerus met 2

 

Shoulder RCCShoulder RCC embolisation 1Shoulder tumour prosthesis

 

Results

 

Wu et al J Orthop Traumatol 2023

- 45 patients with proximal humerus metastasis

- IM nailing + cement versus plate

- lower blood loss and shorted hospital stay with IMN

- better pain relief with IMN

 

Humeral shaft 

 

Options

 

Plate +/- cement

IMN +/- cement

 

Humeral shaft metsHumeral met IMN

 

Metastasis Humerus Plate PMMA0001Metastasis Humerus Plate PMMA0002

 

Path # humerus Path # plate

 

Results IMN

 

Moura et al Rev Bras Ortop 2019

- 86 pathological humeral fractures treated with IMN

- 5% surgical complication rate

 

Kobryn et al Cancers 2023

- 100 IMN for pathological humerus fracture

- surgical complication rate 11% with cement, 4% without

 

Results plate

 

Weiss et al JBJB Br 2011

- 63 pathological humerus fractures

- all treated with cement + plate

- 11% reoperation rate

 

IMN versus plate

 

Hoellwarth et al Injury 2020

- stabilization of humerus pathological fracture

- broken implant 0% IMN at final follow up

- broken implant 14% plate + cement at final follow up

 

Tibia

 

Tibia met 1Tibia met 2Tibia met 3Tibia met 4

 

Greenbaum et al Am J Orthop 2017

- 43 tibial metastasis

- proximal tibia most common

- variety of treatements

- plate / nail / arthroplasty