Principles of Tumour Surgery

Aim

 

Tumour removal to gain local control and minimize recurrence while maintaining functional limb 

 

Margins

 

1.  Intralesional

 

Within lesion

- macroscopic tumour remains

 

2.  Marginal

 

Within reactive zone

- microscopic tumour remains

 

3.  Wide 

 

Intra-compartmental and outside of reactive zone

- remove tumour and cuff of normal tissue

 

4.  Radical

 

Extra-compartmental 

- removal of all compartments that contain tumour

- at least two compartments

- limb salvage possible with radical resection

- however, amputation may be only practical method

 

Limb Salvage

 

Principles

 

Must have same survival rates

Must not delay adjuvant treatment

Reconstruction should be enduring with minimal complications

Function should approach that achieved by amputation

 

Absolute and Relative Contraindications

 

PIN LEG

- Pathological fracture

- Infection

- NV bundle involvement

- LLD > 8 cm

- Extensive muscle loss

- Good v poor biopsy

 

Absolute

 

1.  Can't obtain wide margins

2.  Major NV bundle involvement

3.  Infection

 

Relative

 

1.  Pathological fracture

- hematoma spreads tumour beyond accurately defined limits

- may necessitate amputation

 

2.  Inappropriate previous biopsy

- contamination of other compartment

 

3.  Significant skeletal immaturity

- predicted LLD > 8cm

- adjustable / growing joint replacements available

 

4.  Extensive muscle involvement

- resection leaves leg non functional

 

5.  Medically unfit

 

Technique principles

 

Radical or wide resection

- extra-articular resection is preferred if a tumour is adjacent to or involves a joint

- prophylactic antibiotics

- no tourniquet if possible

- biopsy site excised

- tumour and/or pseudocapsule not visualised during procedure.

- distant flaps should not be developed until the tumour has been removed

- all dead space should be eliminated and hematoma formation should be prevented

- surgical wound marked with clips for later radiotherapy

- regional muscle transfer

- adequate soft tissue coverage

 

Reconstruction Options

 

Modular Endoprosthesis

Allograft reconstruction

Autograft reconstruction

 

Modular Endoprosthesis 

 

Proximal Femoral Replacement

 

Advantage

 

Early weight bear and rehabilitation

No risk of non union like allograft

 

Massive Allograft 

 

Massive Femoral Allograft0002Massive Femoral Allograft0001

 

Advantage

- biological reconstruction

- intercalary

- osteochondral

 

Disadvantage

- incorporation is a slow and incomplete process

- risk of nonunion / fracture

 

Autograft / Vascularised fibula graft

 

Advantage over allografts

- more rapid incorporation

- stronger initial construct secondary to graft hypertrophy

 

Disadvantage

- increased surgical time

- surgical site morbidity

- size limitations

- stress fractures

 

Outcomes

 

Rosenberg et al, Ann Surg 1982

- Landmark article

- 43 sarcomas randomised to amputation vs salvage

- Salvage had more recurrence, but 5y disease-free and overall survival the same